Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Samant, T. K.
- Evaluation of Growth and Yield Parameters of Green Gram (Vigna Radiata L.)
Abstract Views :215 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANGUL (ODISHA), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANGUL (ODISHA), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 3 (2014), Pagination: 427-430Abstract
Abstract not Given.Keywords
CGR, Economics, Greengram, HYV, LAI
- Evaluation of Front Line Demonstration on Rice (Manaswini)
Abstract Views :253 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANGUL (ODISHA), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANGUL (ODISHA), IN
Source
Agriculture Update, Vol 9, No 3 (2014), Pagination: 311-315Abstract
Abstract not Given.Keywords
FLD, Rice, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Technology Index- Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weed Control, Growth Attributes, Yield and Economics in Rabi Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Abstract Views :403 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (O.U.A.T), Angul (Odisha), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (O.U.A.T), Angul (Odisha), IN
Source
International Journal of Plant Protection, Vol 8, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 307-312Abstract
A field trial was conducted during Rabi season of 2013-14 in farmer's field in Sandhapal village of Chhendipada block in Angul district in Odisha to study the effect of weed management practices on weed control, growth attributes, yield and economics in Rabi groundnut .The treatments comprised of different weed management practices viz., T1-Post-emergence application of quizalofop ethyl 0.05 kg ha-1 fb one hand weeding at 25 DAS, T2-Farmers practice of one hand weeding at 25 DAS and T3-Weedy check. The experimental trial was laid out in Randomized Block Design with thirteen replications. The results revealed that post-emergence application of quizalofop ethyl 0.05 kg ha-1 fb one hand weeding at 25 DAS recorded maximum weed control efficiency (71.4 %) with minimum dry weed biomass (79.2 g m-2) at harvest. The same treatment also produced significantly higher pod yield (22.34 q ha-1), plant height (40.13 cm), number of pods plant-1 (19.5), 100 pod weight (81.7 g), 100 seed weight (36.2 g), total dry matter accumulation(2.16 to 25.5 g plant-1), CGR (5.32 to 26.40 g m-2 day-1), gross return (Rs.89360 ha-1) and B:C ratio(2.20) with additional net return of Rs.10280 ha-1as compared to farmers practice and weedy check. Thus, application of quizalofop ethyl 5 per cent 1.0 kg ha-1 fb one hand weeding appeared to be effective, economically viable for weed control, crop growth, higher pod yield and net profit.Keywords
CGR, Dry Weed Biomass, Economic, Groundnut, Quizalofop-Ethyl, WCE.References
- Bhale, V.M. (2012). Odisha Agriculture Statistics 2011-12. Directorate of Agriculture and Food production. Govt. of Odisha.pp.53.
- Bhale, V.M., Karmore, J.V., Patil, Y.R. and Deshmukh, P. (2012). Integrated weed management in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Pak. J. Weed Sci. Res., 18.733-739.
- Bhondave, T.S., Pinjari, S.S. and Suryawanshi, J.S. (2009). Effect of integrated weedmanagement on economics of Kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). Internat. J.Agri. Sci., 5(2): 552-553.
- Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1977). Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Kolkata,95-132 and 142-181.
- Dixit, J.P., Singh, H. and Bhadauria, S.K.S. (2012). Quizalofop ethyl: An effective post emergence herbicide to control grassy weeds of groundnut. Ann. Pl. Soil Res., 14(1):22-24
- Granamurthy, P.N. and Balasubramaniyan, P. (1998). Weed Management practices and their influence on weed growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). Indian J. Agron., 43 : 122-125.
- Jackson, M.L.(1973). Soil Chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi (INDIA).
- Jat, R.S., Meena, H.N., Singh, A.L., Surya Jaya, N. and Misra J.B. (2011). Weed management in groundnut (Arachies hypogaea) in India-A Review. Agric. Rev., 32(3) : 155-171.
- Kondap, S.M. and Upadhyay, U.C. (1985).A Practical Manual of Weed Control. Oxford and IBH Publ. Co., New Delhi (INDIA).
- Kori, R.N., Patil, S.L., Salakinkoppa, S.R. and Hunshal, C.S. (2000). Economics of integrated weed management in irrigated groundnut. J. Oilseeds Res., 17: 61-65.
- Martin, P. and Rademacher, B.(1960). The Biology of weeds. Harper, J. L. Blackwell scientific publications, Oxford, England, pp.143-152.
- Mene, M.J., Powar, M.S., Jadhav, M.G. and Chavan, S.A. (2003). Efficacy of different herbicides in Kharif groundnut under konkan condition of Maharashtra. Indian J. Dryland Agric.Res. & Development, 18(1): 84-88.
- Murthy, B. G., Agasimani, C. A. and Babalad, H.B. (1992). Studies on weed management in bunchy groundnut. J. Oilseeds Res., 9(2): 322-325.
- Muzik, J.J. (1970). Chemical use for weed control-weed biology and control, Mc. Graw HillBook Company, New York.
- Patel, S.R., Agrawal, S.K. and Chandrakear, P.K. (1997). Weed management studies in Rabi-summer groundnut (Arachis hypogeaea) grown after rice. J. Oilseed Res., 14: 55-58.
- Patra, A.K. and Nayak, B.C. (2001). Integrated weed management in rainy season groundnut. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 71 (6) : 378-380.
- Samant, T.K. and Prusty, M. (2014b). Effect of Weed management on yield, economics and nutrient uptake in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentumMill.). Adv. Res. J. Crop Improve., 5 (2):144-188.
- Samant, T.K., Mishra, A. and Panigrahi, D. (2014). Evaluation of growth and yield parameters of rice hybrids in table land zone of Odisha. Res. J. Agric. Sci., 5(5):972-975.
- Sharma, P.B. (2000). Quizalofop ethyl: An efficient herbicide against grassy weeds of soybean. Pestology., 24 (4): 60-62.
- Singh, M.V., Kumar, N. and Singh, R.K. (2012). Effect of plant geometry and methods of weed control on growth and yield of pigeonpea. Ann. Pl. Soil Res., 14(1):36-38.
- Shetty, S.V.R. and Rao, M.R. (1977). Weed management studies in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) based intercropping. Sixth conference. Acian Pacific Weed Science Society. 655-672.
- Tewari, K. K., Singh, K.K., Sharma, J.K. and Tewari, V.S.(1989). Crop weed competition in groundnut + pigeonpea inter cropping under rainfed condition. Indian J. Agron., 34: 167-171.